Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Kalshi Fees) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Place a position → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Place a position → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Place a position → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Place a position → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Place a position → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| CF Cruz Azul O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| CF Cruz Azul 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| CF Cruz Azul O/U 1.5 | 60% |
| Philadelphia Union O/U 0.5 | 59% |
| Both Teams to Score | 56% |
| O/U 1.5 | 51% |
| CF Cruz Azul O/U 2.5 | 50% |
| Philadelphia Union O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score in Second Half | 50% |
| 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| 2nd Half O/U 2.5 | 50% |
| CF Cruz Azul 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| CF Cruz Azul 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| Philadelphia Union 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Philadelphia Union 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| CF Cruz Azul (-1.5) | 46% |
| Philadelphia Union O/U 2.5 | 27% |
| O/U 2.5 | 14% |
| Philadelphia Union (-1.5) | 4% |
| CF Cruz Azul (-2.5) | 4% |
| O/U 3.5 | 3% |
| Philadelphia Union (-2.5) | 1% |
| O/U 5.5 | 1% |
| CF Cruz Azul 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 1% |
| Philadelphia Union 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 1% |
| O/U 4.5 | 0% |
| Both Teams to Score in First Half | 0% |
| 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| 1st Half O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| Philadelphia Union 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
Market context
Cruz Azul and the Philadelphia Union are playing a Leagues Cup match scheduled for 6 August at 8:00 PM ET, with the market framed around whether there will be *more markets* to trade rather than a simple win-or-lose outcome. In practical terms, a power-user would treat this as a product-flow question: monitor whether the event survives to full settlement, whether additional sub-markets are listed, and whether any pre-match or in-play data changes the pricing around the 46% crowd-implied YES level.
The main historical anchor is the pair’s recent Leagues Cup meeting, which finished 1-1 before Cruz Azul won the shootout 5-3, and the game itself was shaped by a late Philadelphia equaliser and a midfield adjustment that altered control of the centre of the pitch.[7][8][10] That is useful for reading this market because comparable events between these sides have not been one-sided, and Leagues Cup previews also noted each team arriving with broadly similar recent form and a small edge to Cruz Azul in the competition’s own headline framing.[2] For a trader modelling the market programmatically, the prior meeting suggests watching for volatility from late goals, shootout risk, and any format-specific rules that can expand or contract the set of live derivatives.
Catalysts are likely to be operational rather than purely footballing: confirmed line-ups, squad rotation, disciplinary news, and broadcast or competition scheduling changes can all affect whether extra markets are launched or become relevant. The Leagues Cup match preview and club material indicate both sides were expected to field competitive teams, while matchday coverage pointed to Philadelphia’s direct style against Cruz Azul’s more defensive approach, making midfield control a key dependency for in-play pricing.[2][16] A bot or conditional-order setup would typically key off line-up announcements, first-goal timing, and any status change from regulation to penalties, because those are the moments when secondary markets are most likely to reprice or be added.
Methodology
We track CF Cruz Azul vs. Philadelphia Union - More Markets across the five venues with material prediction-market liquidity. The probability shown is the live Polymarket mid; the comparison rows summarise how each venue treats the underlying contract — fees, KYC thresholds, settlement currency, deposit options. The highlighted row marks the cheapest route into Polymarket's order book.
Resolution & payout
At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.
On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.
FAQ
- Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. The easiest 0%-fee broker into the same order book is Kalshi Fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.
- Is this market available outside the US?
- Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check the legal status of prediction markets in your jurisdiction before trading.
- What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
- A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- Do I need to KYC for this market?
- On Polymarket directly, no — it's wallet-based. Intermediary brokers like Kalshi Fees trigger KYC only above $1,500 of lifetime trading volume; under that you trade pseudonymously with a single wallet address.
- How reliable are the quoted odds?
- The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.
Trade CF Cruz Azul vs. Philadelphia Union - More Markets on Kalshi Fees
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →