Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Kalshi Fees) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Place a position → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Place a position → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Place a position → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Place a position → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Place a position → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| O/U 1.5 | 100% |
| 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| Crawley Town FC O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| Crawley Town FC 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| Crawley Town FC O/U 1.5 | 99% |
| Crawley Town FC 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 99% |
| Crawley Town FC (-1.5) | 93% |
| York City FC O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| York City FC O/U 2.5 | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score in Second Half | 50% |
| 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| 2nd Half O/U 2.5 | 50% |
| York City FC 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| York City FC 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| Crawley Town FC 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| O/U 5.5 | 15% |
| O/U 2.5 | 14% |
| York City FC O/U 0.5 | 14% |
| Both Teams to Score | 10% |
| Crawley Town FC (-2.5) | 5% |
| Crawley Town FC O/U 2.5 | 5% |
| York City FC (-1.5) | 1% |
| O/U 3.5 | 1% |
| York City FC (-2.5) | 0% |
| O/U 4.5 | 0% |
| Both Teams to Score in First Half | 0% |
| 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| 1st Half O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| York City FC 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 0% |
| York City FC 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| Crawley Town FC 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
Market context
York City and Crawley Town meet in the EFL Cup preliminary round at the LNER Community Stadium, with the crowd assigning this “more markets” contract only a 1% yes probability. That is consistent with a thin, optionality-style market: when the listed outcome is not the match result itself, but whether *additional* listed contingencies appear, the base rate is usually driven by the platform’s market-design rules rather than by team strength alone, so programmatic traders typically start by checking the exact clause chain and any linked sub-markets before assuming a football-shaped price should dominate.
For comparison, York arrived with a stronger recent run in the results shown by match trackers, while Crawley’s end-of-season league form was mixed and included several low-scoring draws and defeats.[2][10] Head-to-head data is also limited and uneven: one recent summary shows Crawley with the edge in the small sample, while another aggregate splits the meetings more broadly, which is a reminder that low-liquidity cup markets can move on sparse historical baselines.[4][8][17] For a trader running bots or conditional orders, the useful frame is not “who wins?” but whether the market definition is likely to trigger from ordinary match reporting, post-match settlement rules, or an edge case such as replay, postponement, or market expansion.
The main catalysts are operational rather than tactical: line-up announcements, any change to kick-off timing, and whether the match reaches the competition and settlement conditions embedded in the contract before the window closes at 18:30 UTC.[2][16] Live score and preview feeds already show the fixture as active on 3 August, so a systematic monitor would watch official team sheets, referee or venue updates, and the market’s own rule text for dependencies that could widen the “more markets” set after the first whistle.[1][2][12] In a low-percentage contract like this, execution quality matters as much as football news, because the price can reflect rule ambiguity faster than any late team-news shock.
Methodology
We track York City FC vs. Crawley Town FC - More Markets across the five venues with material prediction-market liquidity. The probability shown is the live Polymarket mid; the comparison rows summarise how each venue treats the underlying contract — fees, KYC thresholds, settlement currency, deposit options. The highlighted row marks the cheapest route into Polymarket's order book.
Resolution & payout
At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.
On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.
FAQ
- Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. The easiest 0%-fee broker into the same order book is Kalshi Fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.
- Is this market available outside the US?
- Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check the legal status of prediction markets in your jurisdiction before trading.
- What does Polymarket cost to trade?
- Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.
- How fast are USDC deposits?
- Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
- Do I need to KYC for this market?
- On Polymarket directly, no — it's wallet-based. Intermediary brokers like Kalshi Fees trigger KYC only above $1,500 of lifetime trading volume; under that you trade pseudonymously with a single wallet address.
Trade York City FC vs. Crawley Town FC - More Markets on Kalshi Fees
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →