Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Kalshi Fees) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Place a position → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Place a position → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Place a position → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Place a position → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Place a position → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| FK Partizan Beograd (-1.5) | 100% |
| FK Partizan Beograd (-2.5) | 100% |
| O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| O/U 1.5 | 100% |
| O/U 2.5 | 100% |
| 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| FK Partizan Beograd O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| FK Partizan Beograd O/U 1.5 | 100% |
| FK Partizan Beograd O/U 2.5 | 100% |
| FK Partizan Beograd 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 100% |
| FK Partizan Beograd 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| FK Partizan Beograd 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 100% |
| Tobyl FK (-1.5) | 0% |
| Tobyl FK (-2.5) | 0% |
| O/U 3.5 | 0% |
| O/U 4.5 | 0% |
| O/U 5.5 | 0% |
| Both Teams to Score | 0% |
| Both Teams to Score in First Half | 0% |
| 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| 1st Half O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| Tobyl FK O/U 0.5 | 0% |
| Tobyl FK O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| Tobyl FK O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| FK Partizan Beograd 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| Tobyl FK 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 0% |
| Tobyl FK 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| Both Teams to Score in Second Half | 0% |
| 2nd Half O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| Tobyl FK 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 0% |
| Tobyl FK 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
Market context
FK Partizan Beograd are playing Tobyl FK in the UEFA Europa Conference League qualifying tie, with the match scheduled for 6 August at 3:00 PM ET. In a programmematic workflow, the relevant distinction is that the underlying football fixture is deterministic, while a “More Markets” contract depends on whether the sportsbook or exchange publishes additional derivative markets around it before the settlement window closes.
Historical and comparable pricing suggests this is usually read as a strong-favourite spot for Partizan rather than a coin-flip on the presence of extra markets. Public odds for the match winner were heavily skewed towards Partizan, with home-win prices around 1.33-1.41 and away prices around 8.50-10.00, while model sites also leaned to a Partizan win and low-scoring outcomes.[2][3][4][10][11][12][16][19] For a power-user running bots or conditional orders, that matters because a 100% crowd-implied probability on “YES” implies the market is already pricing in the expectation that more markets will appear, leaving little room for an upside surprise unless the venue, competition feed, or market-listing rules change late.[1]
The main catalysts to watch are operational rather than match-performance driven: whether the fixture list is updated, whether the market feed opens with the full derivative slate, and whether any postponement, rescheduling, or data-provider delay affects settlement. Live score and odds pages indicate the match was active across major football feeds on the day, so automated strategies would typically monitor for the first publication of team, goal, cards, or qualification derivatives rather than the result itself.[6][7][13][18] If using copy-trading or conditional orders, the practical dependency is the exchange’s market-generation logic: the position will usually resolve on whether additional markets are listed for this specific fixture before the window ends.
Methodology
Methodologically we separate two layers: the live probability (Polymarket mid-price) and the platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement currency, payment rails). That keeps the comparison honest — a single canonical probability across the row, with the venue-by-venue trade-offs spelt out in the columns next to it.
Resolution & payout
At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.
On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.
FAQ
- Is this market available outside the US?
- Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check the legal status of prediction markets in your jurisdiction before trading.
- How does resolution work?
- Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
- What does Polymarket cost to trade?
- Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.
- How fast are USDC deposits?
- Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
- How reliable are the quoted odds?
- The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.
Trade FK Partizan Beograd vs. Tobyl FK - More Markets on Kalshi Fees
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →