Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Kalshi Fees) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Place a position → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Place a position → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Place a position → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Place a position → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Place a position → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| FK Jablonec (-1.5) | 100% |
| O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| O/U 1.5 | 100% |
| 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| FK Jablonec O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| FK Jablonec O/U 1.5 | 100% |
| FK Jablonec 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| FK Jablonec 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| FK Rīgas Futbola Skola (-1.5) | 0% |
| FK Jablonec (-2.5) | 0% |
| FK Rīgas Futbola Skola (-2.5) | 0% |
| O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| O/U 3.5 | 0% |
| O/U 4.5 | 0% |
| O/U 5.5 | 0% |
| Both Teams to Score | 0% |
| Both Teams to Score in First Half | 0% |
| 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| 1st Half O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| FK Jablonec O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| FK Rīgas Futbola Skola O/U 0.5 | 0% |
| FK Rīgas Futbola Skola O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| FK Rīgas Futbola Skola O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| FK Jablonec 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| FK Rīgas Futbola Skola 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 0% |
| FK Rīgas Futbola Skola 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| Both Teams to Score in Second Half | 0% |
| 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| 2nd Half O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| FK Jablonec 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| FK Rīgas Futbola Skola 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 0% |
| FK Rīgas Futbola Skola 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
Market context
FK Jablonec meet FK Rīgas Futbola Skola in a UEFA Europa Conference League qualifier, and the “more markets” contract is effectively a proxy for whether the match generates additional listed outcomes rather than just a single result line. With the crowd-implied probability pinned at 100% YES, the market is already treating extra pricing depth as a certainty, so the useful angle for a power user is not direction but execution: watch for whether books and exchange-style feeds actually expand into goals, cards, halves or player props as the fixture model gets updated.
Comparable pricing gives a mixed read on the underlying match state. Pre-match odds sources lean to Jablonec, with home-win prices around 1.47–1.70, while draw and away outcomes remain live enough to keep the market from being one-sided; at the same time, totals are fairly low, with over/under lines around 1.25 to 2.5 and both-teams-to-score sitting near coin-flip territory in several books.[1][2][10] That combination usually produces more second-order markets than a blowout would, because traders have multiple branches to express view: home control, draw protection, or low-scoring variance.
For programmatic traders, the main catalysts are market-structure events rather than team news alone: lineups, confirmed kick-off, settlement rule detail, and any late movement in goals or BTTS lines that would justify additional contracts being listed. If you are automating entries or copy-trading around this event, the practical check is whether the event feed has switched from pre-match to live availability and whether the sportsbook consensus is still aligned; ESPN’s pre-match board still shows active goal and first-half prices, which is the sort of input that typically feeds expansion into related markets.[7]
Methodology
Methodologically we separate two layers: the live probability (Polymarket mid-price) and the platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement currency, payment rails). That keeps the comparison honest — a single canonical probability across the row, with the venue-by-venue trade-offs spelt out in the columns next to it.
Resolution & payout
At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.
On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.
FAQ
- Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. The easiest 0%-fee broker into the same order book is Kalshi Fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.
- Is this market available outside the US?
- Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check the legal status of prediction markets in your jurisdiction before trading.
- What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
- A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- What does Polymarket cost to trade?
- Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.
- How fast are USDC deposits?
- Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
Trade FK Jablonec vs. FK Rīgas Futbola Skola - More Markets on Kalshi Fees
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →