Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Kalshi Fees) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
72% | 28% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Place a position → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
72% | 28% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Place a position → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Place a position → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Place a position → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Place a position → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| United Russia (ER) | 72% |
| New People (NL) | 20% |
| Liberal Democratic Party of Russia (LDPR) | 5% |
| Communist Party of the Russian Federation (KPRF) | 2% |
| Yabloko | 1% |
| A Just Russia – For Truth (SRZP) | 0% |
| Rodina | 0% |
| Civic Platform (GP) | 0% |
| Other | 0% |
| Party B | 0% |
| Party C | 0% |
| Party D | 0% |
| Party E | 0% |
| Party F | 0% |
| Party G | 0% |
| Party H | 0% |
| Party I | 0% |
| Party J | 0% |
| Party K | 0% |
| Party L | 0% |
| Party M | 0% |
| Party N | 0% |
| Party O | 0% |
| Party P | 0% |
| Party Q | 0% |
| Party R | 0% |
| Party S | 0% |
| Party T | 0% |
| Party U | 0% |
| Party V | 0% |
| Party W | 0% |
| Party X | 0% |
| Party Y | 0% |
| Party Z | 0% |
Market context
Russia’s September 2026 State Duma election is the event to track, with 450 seats at stake and the current market priced around the expectation that United Russia will again finish with the biggest seat increase. That matters because this market resolves on *net gains* versus the pre-election chamber, not on who simply wins the most seats outright, so a party with a large existing bloc can still be favoured if the baseline is set low enough by vacancies or seat reallocation.
The historical read-through is straightforward: Russian Duma contests have repeatedly produced a dominant outcome for United Russia, while the opposition’s gains have typically been constrained by the electoral system and the Kremlin’s control over candidate access and campaign conditions. Recent polling proxies still point in that direction, with one July FOM projection giving United Russia 243 seats and the nearest challengers far behind, which implies the party remains the obvious benchmark for most-seat gain scenarios[1]. Other projection models also place United Russia well ahead, with seat estimates in the low- to mid-300s and a near-certain lead over the smaller systemic parties[3][4].
For a power-user watching this programmatically, the key catalysts are the formal election timetable, candidate registration, list clearance, and any change to district boundaries or seat mechanics, because those affect the comparison baseline and the eventual gains calculation. The election is scheduled for 18–20 September 2026, and the Central Election Commission has already registered United Russia’s federal list, with further registration and campaign-stage announcements still capable of shifting implied probabilities if they change the expected seat map[5]. In practice, a bot or conditional order setup would monitor official CEC notices, polling releases, and any late exclusions or administrative changes, since those are the inputs most likely to move the market before settlement.
Methodology
We track Which party will gain most seats in Russian Parliamentary Election? across the five venues with material prediction-market liquidity. The probability shown is the live Polymarket mid; the comparison rows summarise how each venue treats the underlying contract — fees, KYC thresholds, settlement currency, deposit options. The highlighted row marks the cheapest route into Polymarket's order book.
Resolution & payout
Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.
Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.
FAQ
- Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. The easiest 0%-fee broker into the same order book is Kalshi Fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.
- Is this market available outside the US?
- Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check the legal status of prediction markets in your jurisdiction before trading.
- How does resolution work?
- Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
- What does Polymarket cost to trade?
- Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.
- How fast are USDC deposits?
- Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
Trade Which party will gain most seats in Russian Parliame… on Kalshi Fees
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →