Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Kalshi Fees) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Place a position → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Place a position → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Place a position → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Place a position → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Place a position → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Map 1 Winner | 100% |
| O/U 2.5 Games | 100% |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: FunPlus Phoenix (-2.5) vs JD Gaming (+2.5) | 100% |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 100% |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 22.5 | 100% |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 20.5 | 100% |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 20.5 | 100% |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 19.5 | 100% |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 22.5 | 1% |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 1% |
| Map 3 Rounds Handicap: FunPlus Phoenix (-2.5) vs JD Gaming (+2.5) | 1% |
| Map 2 Rounds Handicap: FunPlus Phoenix (-3.5) vs JD Gaming (+3.5) | 1% |
| Map 2 Winner | 0% |
| Match Winner | 0% |
| Map Handicap: FPX (-1.5) vs JD Gaming (+1.5) | 0% |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 0% |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 22.5 | 0% |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 20.5 | 0% |
| Map 2 Rounds Handicap: FunPlus Phoenix (-2.5) vs JD Gaming (+2.5) | 0% |
Market context
FunPlus Phoenix and JD Gaming are set for a best-of-three in the VCT China Stage 2 Play-Ins upper-bracket quarter-finals, with multiple match listings pointing to an 06:00–08:00 UTC start on 6 August and a live series format that means the market should only settle after the game state is fully known.[1][2][8] For a programmatic workflow, the key dependency is not just the scheduled start time but confirmation that the series actually begins and reaches completion, because any cancellation, tie, or delay beyond seven days forces a 50-50 outcome under the market rules.
The current **100% YES** crowd price implies the market is effectively treating FunPlus Phoenix as a certainty, but that is far stronger than the historical evidence. The teams have split their past four meetings 2-2, and FunPlus Phoenix won their most recent recorded series 2-0 in Stage 2 group play, with map scores of 13-8 on Breeze and 13-9 on Ascent.[5][7][18] Pre-match books and modelled prices from coverage sites were much closer to a normal competitive spot, with FPX around 1.73 and JD Gaming around 2.06 on VLR, which is consistent with a live series where an upset remains plausible rather than impossible.[2]
A trader watching this mechanically should monitor bracket integrity, official lobby confirmation, and any schedule slips from Riot or tournament trackers, because the settlement logic is sensitive to whether the match starts on time and finishes without interruption.[1][11][19] The broader tournament sits inside VCT China Stage 2, which Liquipedia and event listings place across early August with pool seeding that includes JD Gaming as a top-two Stage 1 seed and FunPlus Phoenix in the same competitive cluster, so substitution, walkover, or bracket reshuffle risk is low but not zero.[14][16] In practice, a bot or conditional order setup would key off official series start, then remain exposed until the final map result is posted, rather than assuming the pre-match probability is tradeable as a one-way event.
Methodology
We track Valorant: FunPlus Phoenix vs JD Gaming (BO3) - VCT China Stage 2 Play-Ins across the five venues with material prediction-market liquidity. The probability shown is the live Polymarket mid; the comparison rows summarise how each venue treats the underlying contract — fees, KYC thresholds, settlement currency, deposit options. The highlighted row marks the cheapest route into Polymarket's order book.
Resolution & payout
At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.
On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.
FAQ
- Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. The easiest 0%-fee broker into the same order book is Kalshi Fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.
- How does resolution work?
- Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
- What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
- A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- What does Polymarket cost to trade?
- Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.
- How fast are USDC deposits?
- Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
Trade Valorant: FunPlus Phoenix vs JD Gaming (BO3) - VCT C… on Kalshi Fees
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →